Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw


calfoxwc

Recommended Posts

 

You describe it as a "huge lull", but that isn't necessarily the case. This slow down was addressed in a link I posted. That site does a good job explaining it all IMO.

 

You then go on about "libturds", and "Al Gorish" and politics in general. My suggestion would be to ignore the politicians, and look at the scientists. The real experts in the field. Look at the peer reviewed studies and impartial data. No lies, no politics.

Woody, the slow down was addressed in a link Cal posted as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, here is all you need to know about mmgw.

 

It's a farce. All these idiots flew in all these JETS, to

 

go to this Davos conference.

 

And the other big item on their agenda? Wait for it......

 

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/20/1700-private-jets-fly-to-davos-to-discuss-global-warming/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, there ya go.....

 

"Another big theme of the mega-rich confab will be combating “income inequality” and how the world’s rich can pay their fair share to reduce the gap between top earners and the lower class. Admission price for Davos: roughly $40,000 a ticket."

 

See that? INCOME INEQUALITY. WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION.

 

That's why they demand that mmgw be accepted as an absolute, immediate crisis.

 

To expedite, facilitate... redistributing wealth from the richer countries to the poorer countries.

 

That is what I've been saying again and again all this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note: I never said they were scientists, Chris.

 

That has nothing to do with the point. Don't be a woodypeckerhead,

one is far, far too many on this board already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, this is good. There's a new consensus global warming wonks can quote

24/7, "eight days a week"...

 

http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/19/the-new-consensus-100-of-scientists-agree-that-global-warming-stopped-or-slowed-down/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note: I never said they were scientists, Chris.

 

That has nothing to do with the point. Don't be a woodypeckerhead,

one is far, far too many on this board already.

How many times do we need to hammer on that head of yours to get to the actual point? We shouldn't be listening to politicians, or 'heads of businesses' - we should be listening to scientists. Maybe it needs to be on the end of a woodpecker's beak to help up get it in there ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then don't be a moron, The point is, that all these mmgw activists JET to

vacation and go to a mmgw conference. Of course I'm not listening to the politicians.

 

It's a hyprocitical bunch of bs. And they had REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH

on their agenda, while they JET to that vacationland conference.

 

This isn't an argument about what scientists agree/don't agree.

 

That isn't the point here. It has ....nothing...to...do...with....scientists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point was about the hypocrisy of the activists, Chris.

 

That's all. There, I just gave you a quack to the head with my

Duck Dynasty Uncle Si duck call special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...