Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Christian bakers case goes back to court. They should win, too.


calfoxwc

Recommended Posts

Please give an example.

 

 

I was stating that it seems like our laws would be based around denying service for something the customer can't control (gender, race, sexual orientation). Though, it would be nice if we didn't need any of those laws.

 

well but now you'll butt into the age old argument that sexual orientation is indeed controllable. Gay men specifically choose hog over vag. Like they were all about vag at one point in their lives and then were like "hey, wait a minute.....I may have been going about this all wrong"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

well but now you'll butt into the age old argument that sexual orientation is indeed controllable. Gay men specifically choose hog over vag. Like they were all about vag at one point in their lives and then were like "hey, wait a minute.....I may have been going about this all wrong"

 

Sexual Orientation isn't a choice - but that indeed is a controversy still sadly.

 

Also you get into religion, which is a choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please give an example.

 

 

I was stating that it seems like our laws would be based around denying service for something the customer can't control (gender, race, sexual orientation). Though, it would be nice if we didn't need any of those laws.

That's why I gave you two scenarios. I doubt they were denied service for being gay. If a gay guy came in and wanted a banana nut muffin I highly doubt the bakers would have shouted "get the fuck out of here, faggot!" But bring asked to create something they're uncomfortable with is a different story.

 

And yes the gays in question did choose...they chose to target a christian baker who they could feel pretty sure would find their request uncomfortable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please give an example.

 

 

I was stating that it seems like our laws would be based around denying service for something the customer can't control (gender, race, sexual orientation). Though, it would be nice if we didn't need any of those laws.

I already gave you an example. Please attempt to keep up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many other goods and services related to weddings would you ok with gay weddings being denied?

 

 

And again, I'd love to think that they'd just have the option to go somewhere else but 1) should it really have to get to that point 2) depending on how this grows, that might be even less of an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I'd be generally fine serving pretty much anyone, if I were a baker. Cake is cake. It's not like me giving them a nice dessert is going to further 'the cause'. But I would be a lot more comfortable serving people whose 'cause' is a positive one (let gay people get married in this instance) rather than a negative one (all insert-group-here should be killed/enslaved/other).

 

If I'm a doctor, I've sworn a Hippocratic oath, not a hypocritical one. Hey-oh! But seriously, as has been said many times before, we shouldn't need to even discuss this - the baker should bake the damn cake and not give a shit about what someone else does with their genitals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't know that a guy with a swastika tattoo actually hates. Maybe he went to prison. You've gotta get by by any means possible.

 

Again. Don't target the Christian bakery and this isn't an issue. This was a deliberate targeting which all of you seem to be fine with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't know that a guy with a swastika tattoo actually hates. Maybe he went to prison. You've gotta get by by any means possible.

 

Again. Don't target the Christian bakery and this isn't an issue. This was a deliberate targeting which all of you seem to be fine with.

I thought we were talking in general. At least, you keep trying to make general points. Obviously, deliberately targeting something with the intention of causing trouble is stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I'd be generally fine serving pretty much anyone, if I were a baker. Cake is cake. It's not like me giving them a nice dessert is going to further 'the cause'. But I would be a lot more comfortable serving people whose 'cause' is a positive one (let gay people get married in this instance) rather than a negative one (all insert-group-here should be killed/enslaved/other).

 

If I'm a doctor, I've sworn a Hippocratic oath, not a hypocritical one. Hey-oh! But seriously, as has been said many times before, we shouldn't need to even discuss this - the baker should bake the damn cake and not give a shit about what someone else does with their genitals.

But, and we've been through this before, I don't think you would destroy the business of a black bakery that refused to make it for the Ku Klux Klan, or a Jewish delicatessen that refused to cater a Nazi party event.

 

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought we were talking in general. At least, you keep trying to make general points. Obviously, deliberately targeting something with the intention of causing trouble is stupid.

I'm not making general points I'm making highly specific points. Here's another one: should a screen printer be forced to make something objectionable? I had a shirt made once in brown with orange block letters that said "Fuck the fuckin steelers" in huge print on the front.

 

Now if I went to Pittsburgh and tried to have that made would you have a huge problem if they refused to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, and we've been through this before, I don't think you would destroy the business of a black bakery that refused to make it for the Ku Klux Klan, or a Jewish delicatessen that refused to cater a Nazi party event.

 

WSS

I would not, no. But that's not exactly the right analogy - it would be the other way around here, a WBC couple ordering from a gay bakery. You're very quick to equate being gay with being in the KKK or nazism, as if being gay is an evil thing that people choose to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if Woody and Cleve go dressed as usual holding hands into a Mooslem bakery and order a gay cake, do you think they would get it?

Contrary to what you might think, I wouldn't want to give any special treatment to muslims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contrary to what you might think, I wouldn't want to give any special treatment to muslims.

 

Do you think it would have made national news if it was a muslim bakery?

 

I think LGBT are above muslims on the privilege scale now. White cisgender men are still at the top, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

still waiting for an answer to DH's question.

 

the reluctance is understandable. Liberals don't like

honest questions.

About the muslims? I thought I answered that. In any case, it would vary from baker to baker but I imagine that in some eor many the would be rejected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not making general points I'm making highly specific points. Here's another one: should a screen printer be forced to make something objectionable? I had a shirt made once in brown with orange block letters that said "Fuck the fuckin steelers" in huge print on the front.

 

Now if I went to Pittsburgh and tried to have that made would you have a huge problem if they refused to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not making general points I'm making highly specific points. Here's another one: should a screen printer be forced to make something objectionable? I had a shirt made once in brown with orange block letters that said "Fuck the fuckin steelers" in huge print on the front.

 

Now if I went to Pittsburgh and tried to have that made would you have a huge problem if they refused to?

 

I think you'd be a dick for doing that, and I think they'd be taking themselves far too seriously if they turned it down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But back to printers: should a christian screen printer be forced to make material related to pornography?

No. But that's different, that's not discriminating based on an inherent biological trait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...