The Cysko Kid Posted April 23, 2016 Report Share Posted April 23, 2016 Surprised this hasn't been brought up yet. I personally don't care who's on what but Harriet Tubman seems a weird choice. If it's just diversity they're going for why not use Fredrick Douglass? He would seem more in line with the rest being a statesman and diplomat as well as an important abolishionist. http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc-news/watch/harriet-tubman-replaces-jackson-on-20-bill-672374851558 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 23, 2016 Report Share Posted April 23, 2016 Surprised this hasn't been brought up yet. I personally don't care who's on what but Harriet Tubman seems a weird choice. If it's just diversity they're going for why not use Fredrick Douglass? He would seem more in line with the rest being a statesman and diplomat as well as an important abolishionist.Frederick Douglass acted all white and stuff. Anyway they kill two birds with one stone, had she been a lesbian they have scored a trifecta. It would probably be in poor taste to suggest she should have been put on a food stamp instead so I won't make that comment. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted April 23, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2016 Frederick Douglass acted all white and stuff. Anyway they kill two birds with one stone, if she was lesbian that have a trifecta. It would probably be in poor taste to suggest she should have been put on a food stamp instead so I won't make that comment. WSS Well there's been a Susan b Anthony coin and a sacagawea coin so the woman bit has been done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 23, 2016 Report Share Posted April 23, 2016 Can't wait for Harriet Tubman and depictions of women's suffrage heroes to pass through the g-string of a stripper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 23, 2016 Report Share Posted April 23, 2016 Can't wait for Harriet Tubman and depictions of women's suffrage heroes to pass through the g-string of a stripper. LOL WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted April 23, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2016 Can't wait for Harriet Tubman and depictions of women's suffrage heroes to pass through the g-string of a stripper. Ha. Wow never thought of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbluhm86 Posted April 23, 2016 Report Share Posted April 23, 2016 So, would I be supporting women's equality if I rolled Ol' Harriet up and did a line of blow off an escort's tits? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 23, 2016 Report Share Posted April 23, 2016 So, would I be supporting women's equality if I rolled Ol' Harriet up and did a line of blow off an escort's tits? Actually unless you're taking it into a gay bias type of thread it would be off her escorts dick. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpkin Eater Posted April 23, 2016 Report Share Posted April 23, 2016 So, would I be supporting women's equality if I rolled Ol' Harriet up and did a line of blow off an escort's tits? That's offensive to homosexuals. Please delete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 23, 2016 Report Share Posted April 23, 2016 So, would I be supporting women's equality if I rolled Ol' Harriet up and did a line of blow off an escort's tits? You would be doing the right thing so long as you aren't paying her .70 cents on the dollar compared to her male escort counterparts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 24, 2016 Report Share Posted April 24, 2016 You would be doing the right thing so long as you aren't paying her .70 cents on the dollar compared to her male escort counterparts.But think about it, besides that whole disgusting homosexual aspect who would give a better blow job? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 24, 2016 Report Share Posted April 24, 2016 But think about it, besides that whole disgusting homosexual aspect who would give a better blow job? WSS hahaha that fucking emoji brought it all together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted April 24, 2016 Report Share Posted April 24, 2016 Save up your 20s because the new ones are worth $12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted April 24, 2016 Report Share Posted April 24, 2016 The horrors of changing the face on our currency, when will this insanity ever end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Fan Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 The horrors of changing the face on our currency, when will this insanity ever end.Because whose dumb face adorns our currency is the real problem with it. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Aunt Jemima would have been the better choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 LOL. Sure, ObaMao, replace all white faces on currency with black faces. And go ahead and replace all Americans with illegals from Mexico, and Europeans, Asians anybody to replace those white Americans. Wait, he's already doing both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaporTrail Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Harriet Tubman was a gunslinger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 I am hoping Harriet's judging look will make people more fiscally responsible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browns149 Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 I am hoping Harriet's judging look will make people more fiscally responsible.probably not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 probably not "Put those goddamn Fritos down." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted April 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 It just seems like an odd choice for such a major bill. I still think fredrick Douglass would look more at home there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 What a bizarre country we have become. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 I'm failing to see why this matters - perhaps someone could explain it? We change who's on our notes quite regularly, in fact we're due for another change: £5: Elizabeth Fry (social reformer) -> Winston Churchill (Winston Churchill) £10: Charles Darwin (that guy creationists hate) -> Jane Austen (that lady schoolkids hate) £20: Adam Smith (economist/division of labour guy) -> James Turner (probably our most famous classical artist) The fifties are staying the same. These people have only been on the notes for maybe 5-10 years, and there's a whole bunch of other people who have been on the notes since they were introduced in 1970. Do the US notes basically never change? I know as far back as I can remember people talk about 'benjamins' and having dead presidents on the money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 [ Frederick Douglass acted all white and stuff. Anyway they kill two birds with one stone, had she been a lesbian they have scored a trifecta. It would probably be in poor taste to suggest she should have been put on a food stamp instead so I won't make that comment. WSS Stuart Plus Douglass was half white, not an authentic black. Other than his racial make up, he was the antithesis of Obama. Funny how the same sentiments Douglass had about our political parties still apply today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 I'm failing to see why this matters - perhaps someone could explain it? We change who's on our notes quite regularly, in fact we're due for another change: Stuart And that's what we're striving for...to be just like you motherfuckers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 Stuart And that's what we're striving for...to be just like you motherfuckers. I'll be honest, I wasn't expecting much from you, and you still disappointed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted April 26, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 As fat as I know the pictures have never changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted April 26, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 So tradition. I just think it's a weird choice. Why not douglass? Why not MLK? Tubman just doesn't seem official enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 So tradition. I just think it's a weird choice. Why not douglass? Why not MLK? Tubman just doesn't seem official enough. I get that. Kinda like Rosa Parks or someone - not particularly official. If they want to have a president, but also some diversity, and piss off republicans, why not just put Obama on there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.