OldBrownsFan Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 The mainstream media is corrupt and is just an extension of the democratic party and Hillary Clinton campaign. https://www.catholics4trump.com/the-true-story-donald-trump-did-not-mock-a-reporters-disability/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 This again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrb12711 Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Because "Catholics 4 Trump" certainly would not have bias in their articles! You guys are seriously the worst with this stuff. When all the factual, data-driven stuff for Hilldawg comes up it's biased but then you source this garbage. Get a grip people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 This again? Why not? The Clinton campaign is still falsely using this against Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Because "Catholics 4 Trump" certainly would not have bias in their articles! You guys are seriously the worst with this stuff. When all the factual, data-driven stuff for Hilldawg comes up it's biased but then you source this garbage. Get a grip people. I could have used any number of sources besides Catholics 4 Trump (except the corrupted MSM who wikileaks have confirmed what we already know about their collusion with the Hillary Clinton campaign). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Why not? The Clinton campaign is still falsely using this against Trump. Well, this is an article from July, when it happened - everyone has seen the video and drawn their conclusions, and pretty much everyone has come to the same conclusion, that that's exactly what he was doing, except 'catholics4trump' apparently. Can't imagine why... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Well, this is an article from July, when it happened - everyone has seen the video and drawn their conclusions, and pretty much everyone has come to the same conclusion, that that's exactly what he was doing, except 'catholics4trump' apparently. Can't imagine why... And the Clinton campaign is still running their false ads in late October about how horrible Trump is for mocking a disabled reporter when Trump says himself he wasn't mocking the reporters disability and all the evidence that supports Trump's denial that doesn't get reported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Oh Trump says he wasn't? Well why didn't you say so?! Now that changes everything! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Catholics4trump have totally convinced me mine own eyes and hears hath dceived with the devils influence to see/hear that which didnt really happen.....praise be to jeeeezzuuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Oh Trump says he wasn't? Well why didn't you say so?! Now that changes everything! You conveniently left out the rest of what I posted about all the evidence that points to Trump's denial besides him saying he never was mocking the reporters disability...Here here let's get it right... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Catholics4trump have totally convinced me mine own eyes and hears hath dceived with the devils influence to see/hear that which didnt really happen.....praise be to jeeeezzuuss If that source is not acceptable then Google "Trump did not mock reporter's disability" and there are too many links for me to post...I went with Catholics 4 Trump just to hear you all squeal about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 I did that before you said - they basically all link back to catholics4trump. "Did Donald Trump actually mock a disabled reporter? One trump support group thinks not..." etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Look, let's be frank for a moment here. Suppose Trump didn't intend to mock the reporter's condition, for the sake of argument. He: 1) ...should have known damn well how that would look when he did it 2) ...shouldn't be mocking a reporter anyway (not exactly presidential) 3) ...has such a reputation as a colossal douche bag that it's not hard to see why people take it as he did 4) ...could have cleared it all up the next day, saying "I absolutely did not intend it in that way, but I can see now how it might have come across like that, I'm sorry for any offense caused" and it would have been dealt with. Instead, he doubles down on attacking the reporter, says he's "using his disability to grandstand" or something. But he did not. Why? Because his whole thing is that he 'says what he thinks and doesn't care about anyone else' - and we're supposed to laud that as a quality in a person? Let alone in a president! Sorry, no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 I did that before you said - they basically all link back to catholics4trump. "Did Donald Trump actually mock a disabled reporter? One trump support group thinks not..." etc Trump was mocking the reporter for backpeddling on a story he wrote. He was backpeddling because it helped vindicate what Trump had said about people in this country who were cheering and celebrating after 9/11. Trump has mocked others in the same fashion such as Ted Cruz but in this case a reporter had a disability that the media could claim he was making fun of his disability. What disability did Cruz have and others whom Trump made similar gestures about? As for mocking a reporter have you seen the media's negative ratings? They are viewed as the lowest on the totem pole and for good reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Trump is an equal opportunity mocker. He mocked a white privileged man (Jeb Bush) harder than anybody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrb12711 Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 If that source is not acceptable then Google "Trump did not mock reporter's disability" and there are too many links for me to post...I went with Catholics 4 Trump just to hear you all squeal about it. Yep, I'm totally sure that's the reason you picked it. Right.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 So how do catholics4drumph explain away his rheetard arm movements? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 So how do catholics4drumph explain away his rheetard arm movements? The journalist that has the disability does not even have those type of arm movements...he is immobilized and his arm is in a fixed position..so the reported mocking of his disability doesn't even line up with his disability...Trump was mocking the reporter and not his disability..I believe his mocking was meant to be more of this reporter as being an exaggerated being flustered than to mock his disability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 The journalist that has the disability does not even have those type of arm movements...he is immobilized and his arm is in a fixed position..so the reported mocking of his disability doesn't even line up with his disability...Trump was mocking the reporter and not his disability..I believe his mocking was meant to be more of this reporter as being an exaggerated being flustered than to mock his disability. ...and the Donald, who had never heard of the guy before this interaction, knew all about the specific disability the guy had, for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrb12711 Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Let's put this a different way because it boils down to two scenarios. 1) He knew the guy had the disability and mocked him-making him a total piece of shit. OR 2) He didn't intend for it to come off that way, but a 4 year old could tell you it would-making him a total fucking idiot. ...so you are supporting a complete idiot or a total piece of shit. Woo hoo? There's no winning this argument is the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbluhm86 Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 I wish the "Catholics4Trump" had this much zeal for bringing Bernard Law back to the US to stand trial. Where is the "honorable" Cardinal, anyway? Oh, that's right: hiding out in Vatican City, with an endowment from the Church. An endowment paid for by the Catholic faithful. Catholics should probably focus on cleaning their own house first before they go back to casting the proverbial stones at others again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Let's put this a different way because it boils down to two scenarios. 1) He knew the guy had the disability and mocked him-making him a total piece of shit. OR 2) He didn't intend for it to come off that way, but a 4 year old could tell you it would-making him a total fucking idiot. ...so you are supporting a complete idiot or a total piece of shit. Woo hoo? There's no winning this argument is the point. Did Trump know this journalist had a disability? And mocking a journalist today is appropriate and they have brought all the derision heaped upon themselves they deserve. What was meant to be the watchdog of our democracy has turned into the lapdogs of the democratic party. The collusion between the liberal media and the democratic party has been brought out even further with the wikilieaks. "Opponents say that Trump met Kovelski in the late 80’s when he did stories on him. Trump admits he may very well have met him back then in the video of Trump wearing the red hat that I posted above. Watch it again. But Trump meets thousands of reporters a week. The number of reporters he had to have met in his life and since the 80’s are astronomical. Not being able to recognize the name “Kovaleski” as someone he supposedly met over a decade ago is totally understandable. And again, even if he did somehow remember the man, the man was not spastic. Neither were Ted Cruz or the General he imitated in similar fashion." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Trump was mocking the reporter...not the reporter's disability. He has mocked others in similar fashion who have no disabilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Trump was mocking the reporter...not the reporter's disability. He has mocked others in similar fashion who have no disabilities. Stop being racist and just believe what the ministry of truth wants you to believe. Hillary ran a commercial on him mocking a disabled reporter that makes it 100% fact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 BTW if people want a laugh, go back a year and look at the comments about Trump from his now-supporters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpkin Eater Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Hillary did nothing while terrorists stormed the embassy in Benghazi, but trump's alleged mocking is clearly much more "deplorable" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Yeah I put this true story of a while ago. It's not fun, and it doesn't further the left-wing narrative so the MSM just ignored it. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 There is no debate what he's doing there. And thats a gif with no audio, throw the audio in and this is settled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Any 10 year old on the planet can tell you whats going on there. You guys are off in a fairytale of contrived bullshit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 BTW if people want a laugh, go back a year and look at the comments about Trump from his now-supporters. I was bigly against Trump in the primary and fully intended to write in Ted Cruz's name on the ballot but the stakes are too high. Even Cruz finally came around and supported Trump because of the damage that will be done if Hillary Clinton is elected. The first casualty will be the supreme court where conservative constitutional justice Scalia will be replaced by a Clinton left wing ideologue justice and the court will immediately move from center right to a solidly liberal supreme court. I still have reservations about Trump but with Trump I hold out hope that he will do things in the best interest of the country versus special interests (which is one of the reasons he says he is running for president) while with Clinton I know already because she has said she will be a third term of Obama. So if you are pleased with how things are after 8 years of Obama you should vote for Clinton. I am not pleased about the direction of the country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.