Browns149 Posted May 17, 2015 Report Share Posted May 17, 2015 No the Democrats don't want to help people with their money they want them to vote Democrat. WSS Just like the republicans. But it's ok because they are up front about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted May 17, 2015 Report Share Posted May 17, 2015 Just like the republicans. But it's ok because they are up front about it Yep. I remember an old english movie where an old fellow was told his wife had been screwing around. He laughed saying that he knew it all along. "Sir I would rather be known as a cuckold than a fool!" WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browns149 Posted May 17, 2015 Report Share Posted May 17, 2015 Yep. I remember an old english movie where an old fellow was told his wife had been screwing around. He laughed saying that he knew it all along. "Sir I would rather be known as a cuckold than a fool!" WSS Haven't heard or seen that word, "cuckold" in years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted May 18, 2015 Report Share Posted May 18, 2015 Are you missing or just overlooking my point? There's no limit in my opinion she can rake in every dollar she can grub. but if she goes out and bangs the Populist drum to set herself up has the savior of the working class... you get it, right? WSS I understand what you are saying(it is a little hypocritical), I just think its weak way to attack someone. The Clintons are extremely popular on the Left and are able to use that popularity to make money by giving speeches(very capitalistic), something that ex-presidents have been doing for years. If the Bushs (sr and jr) where as popular with the right(and willing to do speeches) as the Clintons are with the left they would be making as much money as the Clintons through speaking fees. Also in our political system a poor candidate will never be president, so there is never going to be a president who doesn't have money, most presidents in our system have been millionaires(wealth adjusted to today). Now that being said there is no way I am voting for her....I find her to fake and to polarizing of a figure to actually be president, and I really hope the reps put someone better than the last 2 elections, by better I mean someone who appeals to more moderates and not someone who only appeals to the far right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted May 18, 2015 Report Share Posted May 18, 2015 The republicans will probably have over a dozen candidates running for president in 2016 (6 have declared so far) while our democrats (in communist fashion) have put up their one candidate Hillary and some socialist guy few even know (Bernie Sanders). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted May 18, 2015 Report Share Posted May 18, 2015 Sad I actually voted for Hillary in the primary. I agree she's everything you say, a bad liar, dishonest etc etc etc but I felt there was enough Bush hatred that a Democrat was going to win no matter what. So I figure she would have been better than Obama. Plus if we were going to be stuck with socialized medicine light I preferred her system with the public mandate. oops. Still I probably wouldn't have voted for her in the general so there's that. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.