mjp28 Posted June 21, 2017 Report Share Posted June 21, 2017 Jordan is all in a league by himself. The same with Lebron. Just think it MJ didn't fool around with MLB and proving to himself and the world that he couldn't hit a MLB curveball on a consistent basis....but who can? Toughest test in sports besides maybe franchise NFL QB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted June 21, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2017 If you want to argue just to argue please ignore me. Wilt was physically dominant over lesser competition. It doesn't preclude many, including myself, as giving him the credit of being one of the best basketball players ever but when you evaluate players across generations you factor in the competition they play against. Wilt probably played against more great players than Jordan. He had to go up against Russell, Walton, Kareem, Bellamy, Oscar Robertson, Jerry West and Elgin Baylor when he was not playing with them (most of his career as not with Lakers) Jerry Lucas, Bob Petit, Nate Thurmond, Willis Reed, all the other Celtics...Heinshon/Havlicek etc. I can argue....likely correctly...that Wilt had greater competition in his career than did Jordan. How many great centers did he have to go against? Many. How many great shooting guards did MJ have to go against? Well, there was Drexler...and there was...Drexler...and there was Reggie Miller...and...that is about it. So...if you don't want to argue...then don't pose such an easily arguable question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted June 21, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2017 Didn't Wilt have to play against Bill Russell for years? Who did MJ play against that was that good? See above....at the same position: Drexler and Reggie Miller. (Chris Mullin??) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted June 21, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2017 Russell was good but even he wasn't close to the physical specimen Wilt was. Wilt was some much more physically gifted than everyone he played against. Imagine Shaq in his prime playing against high school kids. I am going to make an assumption that you are not old enough to see Wilt play....or his competition play. Given the smaller league...on just about every night he played against an outstanding opposing center.....and it WAS a big man's game back then...no 3 pt. shot. The game was played primarily in the paint. Russell, Thurmond, Reed, Wes Unseld, Dolph Shayes, Zelmo Beatty, Bellamy, Petit, Artis Gilmore, Bob Lanier. Later he played some against Kareem and Walton, for a year or two maybe. These were men playing the game...big ass motherfuckers, not boys. Wilt did dominate...but he had tough, tough competition. The players outlined in blue above are all Hall of Famers....which, by the way is just about every SOB he went up against. Kareem 7-2 250 Russell 6-10 250 Thurmond 6-11 250 Unseld 6-8 250 Reed 6-9 250 Petit 6-9 210 Bellamy 6-11 225 Gilmore 7-2 260 Lanier 6-10 250 Beatty 6-9 230 These guys all match up with the biggest/best centers of today...or recent years. Shaq of course was a beast at 7'1 325...but he was highly unusual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted June 22, 2017 Report Share Posted June 22, 2017 I am going to make an assumption that you are not old enough to see Wilt play....or his competition play. Given the smaller league...on just about every night he played against an outstanding opposing center.....and it WAS a big man's game back then...no 3 pt. shot. The game was played primarily in the paint. Russell, Thurmond, Reed, Wes Unseld, Dolph Shayes, Zelmo Beatty, Bellamy, Petit, Artis Gilmore, Bob Lanier. Later he played some against Kareem and Walton, for a year or two maybe. These were men playing the game...big ass motherfuckers, not boys. Wilt did dominate...but he had tough, tough competition. The players outlined in blue above are all Hall of Famers....which, by the way is just about every SOB he went up against. Kareem 7-2 250 Russell 6-10 250 Thurmond 6-11 250 Unseld 6-8 250 Reed 6-9 250 Petit 6-9 210 Bellamy 6-11 225 Gilmore 7-2 260 Lanier 6-10 250 Beatty 6-9 230 These guys all match up with the biggest/best centers of today...or recent years. Shaq of course was a beast at 7'1 325...but he was highly unusual. I have only watched Wilt through highlights and specials but here what I've seen. Layups, finger rolls and dunks. His free throw percentage is god awful which is another suggestion he couldn't shoot. I am unaware of anyone who raves about his mid-range game or his incredible hook shot. The guys who I know who watched him play all talk about how dominant he was in the paint. They all talk about his ability to get to the rim. That is only possible if you are bigger, stronger and quicker than the guys defending you. Shaq didn't have a basketball superpower he was just a big guy playing against less physically gifted guys. Michael Jordan had physical abilities that others in his generation didn't have and so does Lebron but they also have the ability to attack a defense in multiple ways which Wilt did not have. Again not saying his dominance didn't exist just that the numbers are skewed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted June 22, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2017 I think you are just taking into account the fact that he was not very good at the free throw line...and extrapolating that to other aspects of his game unwarrantedly. No...he couldn't/didn't shoot 3 pointers...because they didn't exist at the time. The point of the game at that time was to get a shot in as close to the basket as possible. He could run the floor plenty well enough. And his assist numbers are likely as good or better as any big man who ever played...in fact they were just about as good as Jordan's were. You didn't qualify this argument by saying who was the best center or guard or forward....just player....at any position. So...Wilt scored better, rebounded better, and assisted just about as well as Jordan. Jordan probably stole the ball more...but fyi....steals was not a category during Wilt's career, so we don't know what kind of stats he may have had there. You also act as if he was a man among boys. He wasn't. He was a man among men....big men, as I have pointed out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted June 24, 2017 Report Share Posted June 24, 2017 I think you are just taking into account the fact that he was not very good at the free throw line...and extrapolating that to other aspects of his game unwarrantedly. No...he couldn't/didn't shoot 3 pointers...because they didn't exist at the time. The point of the game at that time was to get a shot in as close to the basket as possible. He could run the floor plenty well enough. And his assist numbers are likely as good or better as any big man who ever played...in fact they were just about as good as Jordan's were. You didn't qualify this argument by saying who was the best center or guard or forward....just player....at any position. So...Wilt scored better, rebounded better, and assisted just about as well as Jordan. Jordan probably stole the ball more...but fyi....steals was not a category during Wilt's career, so we don't know what kind of stats he may have had there. You also act as if he was a man among boys. He wasn't. He was a man among men....big men, as I have pointed out. If numbers were the sole determining factor we wouldn't be having any sports discussions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browns149 Posted August 7, 2017 Report Share Posted August 7, 2017 If numbers were the sole determining factor we wouldn't be having any sports discussions. Exactly. Bill Russell would be the greatest player He won 11 titles. END OF STORY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted August 7, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 7, 2017 Exactly. Bill Russell would be the greatest player He won 11 titles. END OF STORY He may be the greatest player nonetheless. It is certainly arguable. Even aside from the 2 NCAA titles, one Olympic Gold Medal (back in the days when you only got one chance to win one), 11 NBA titles....which of course, you can never really put aside. While Russell was not necessarily the prolific scorer (he didn't have to be..but he probably could have if asked)...he played defense, handed out assists, rebounded as well as anyone ever has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 He may be the greatest player nonetheless. It is certainly arguable. Even aside from the 2 NCAA titles, one Olympic Gold Medal (back in the days when you only got one chance to win one), 11 NBA titles....which of course, you can never really put aside. While Russell was not necessarily the prolific scorer (he didn't have to be..but he probably could have if asked)...he played defense, handed out assists, rebounded as well as anyone ever has. Greatness is Greatness.. No matter where it shines in someones game,,,, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 Greatness is Greatness.. No matter where it shines in someones game,,,, Your greatness seems to be popping out of the side or your head....at least according to your avatar! You need to go and revive my thread title "Dickheads on Parade". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted August 15, 2017 Report Share Posted August 15, 2017 Your greatness seems to be popping out of the side or your head....at least according to your avatar! You need to go and revive my thread title "Dickheads on Parade". Lol! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.