DieHardBrownsFan Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/03/28/you-wont-believe-why-california-state-university-deactivated-christian-student-group Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 I guess they just shouldn't put that in their charter. I mean, how many white students are allowed in the black groups on campus? I suppose Lynch is a gay atheist, a member of Obamao's leftist base. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 The battle today is for religious rights versus political correctness. Here a Christian group wants Christian leaders. Imagine that. The fact they got banned shows many times today political correctness is winning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 I guess they just shouldn't put that in their charter. I mean, how many white students are allowed in the black groups on campus? Yeah this is just someone trying to stick it to a religious group on their campus. There are many groups and fraternities on campuses based around race and no one says a peep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicopee John Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/03/28/you-wont-believe-why-california-state-university-deactivated-christian-student-group Let's see, Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Males, Females (all look to be very happy, by the way). Not enough diversity, I guess. Maybe an A-Rab or two, perhaps a Jew and they would be better for it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Well, that's a dumb situation. I'd imagine there aren't any non Christians running for leadership position in that group anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Well, that's a dumb situation. I'd imagine there aren't any non Christians running for leadership position in that group anyway. HaHa...a dumb "situation". Still cant bring yourself to admit its leftism gone amok right Woody? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 HaHa...a dumb "situation". Still cant bring yourself to admit its leftism gone amok right Woody? Would it make you feel better if he said it was super duper dumb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Deuteronomy 17:12 Anyone who shows contempt for the judge or for the priest who stands ministering there to the Lord your God is to be put to death. You must purge the evil from Israel. Books written a few thousand years ago tend to have a pretty violent streak towards the non-believer and those who have used those texts for their own evil agenda have done some pretty heinous stuff. if you were in ancient Israel - yes and if you are an orthodox jew - yes the church is preaching about Jesus - crucified and faith in His redemptive plan the non believer is not subject to death but offered grace and mercy instead but how does Duet 17 justify Lynch's reason exactly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Would it make you feel better if he said it was super duper dumb? Lol...miss the point much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 but how does Duet 17 justify Lynch's reason exactly? They always try to come up with an argument no matter how absurd. "In the famous liberal two-step, they leap from one idiotic point to the next, so you can never nail them. It’s like arguing with someone with Attention Deficit Disorder." - A.C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 if you were in ancient Israel - yes and if you are an orthodox jew - yes the church is preaching about Jesus - crucified and faith in His redemptive plan the non believer is not subject to death but offered grace and mercy instead but how does Duet 17 justify Lynch's reason exactly? Sorry, wrong thread, I will wear the dunce hat for the day, sorry! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 They always try to come up with an argument no matter how absurd. "In the famous liberal two-step, they leap from one idiotic point to the next, so you can never nail them. It’s like arguing with someone with Attention Deficit Disorder." - A.C. You've apparently never seen Cal defend his "anti-mmgw" stance on here then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 You've apparently never seen Cal defend his "anti-mmgw" stance on here then... They are correct on this one, I posted a Boko Haram post in this thread like a moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 They are correct on this one, I posted a Boko Haram post in this thread like a moron. Ya, I was a little confused too, haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Was a comment on the nature of religious texts in general hence no quote from the OP in my post. If you'd like a New Testament quote, "Think not that I came to bring to the earth. I came not to bring peace, but a sword" Matthew 10:34 Not only was it irrelevant to the OP, it is irrelevant period. Only in Islam do they take the violence toward non believers that was written a few thousand years ago literally to this day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 You've apparently never seen Cal defend his "anti-mmgw" stance on here then... Apparently not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 There woodypeckerhead goes again, trying to have a personal conflict with a third party, and redirecting the subject. Birdbraiin, liberal wonk move. As usual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Not only was it irrelevant to the OP, it is irrelevant period. Only in Islam do they take the violence toward non believers that was written a few thousand years ago literally to this day. The KKK & Neo-Nazis would disagree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 The KKK & Neo-Nazis would disagreeI'm in no way defending these jolly groups of fellows but how does their modern day violence compare with extreme Islam in today's world? At least you didn't bring up abortion clinic bombers as an example. I think there's like two of them... WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 I'm in no way defending these jolly groups of fellows but how does their modern day violence compare with extreme Islam in today's world? At least you didn't bring up abortion clinic bombers as an example. I think there's like two of them... WSS Those groups believe that the Bible supports violence against non-believers as still appropriate today even if they are unable to act on it. Problem with this terrorist fanaticism is they are the ones in control in more than a few countries. Right now religious zealots in the christian faith have little to no power and have been pushed into the shadows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Those groups believe that the Bible supports violence against non-believers as still appropriate today even if they are unable to act on it. Problem with this terrorist fanaticism is they are the ones in control in more than a few countries. Right now religious zealots in the christian faith have little to no power and have been pushed into the shadows.And don't forget the David Duke political era in which he, and many, Klansman began to soft peddle the guys in the sheets.It seems the modern day platform has been watered down to racial pride and not a forest of nooses. (Neese?) WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 And don't forget the David Duke political era in which he, and many, Klansman began to soft peddle the guys in the sheets. It seems the modern day platform has been watered down to racial pride and not a forest of nooses. (Neese?) WSS Only you could try and pull that off! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Only you could try and pull that off! I'll take that as a compliment. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 http://inamerica.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/12/a-kinder-gentler-ku-klux-klan-we-do-not-hate-anyone-imperial-wizard-says/ come on now everybody join hands... WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 They are correct on this one, I posted a Boko Haram post in this thread like a moron. n/m then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mohican Posted April 1, 2015 Report Share Posted April 1, 2015 California State University has deactivated an on-campus Christian group because the group has insisted on installing Christians as leaders. The university system is no longer recognizing the Cal State Stanislaus chapter of Chi Alpha, a Christian student organization, because those leadership restrictions allegedly violate an executive order of non-discrimination. Associate VP of Cal State Tim Lynch explained, "What they cannot be is faith-based where someone has to have a profession of faith to be that leader ... Every club is allowed to establish its own standards for how leaders are selected as long as it's non-discriminatory." If anyone wonders how Californias education system went from being the jewel of the free world to the bottome of the barrel of 'Murrican education then don't look too much further. Ever since discrimination has been hard linked to Racial (as in racial discrimination) a process of losing the meaning of the word has begun. A election has to be discriminatory if you want to weed out the unfit and put the best into the leadership roles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.