Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Mega-Drought in USA future due to Climate Change/Global warming


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Strange....???

 

These worrisome climate folks say the opposite - that mmgw

will cause a whole lot MORE rain and snow.

 

Now, how that means "drought" I have no idea.

 

What a crock. It all comes down to fines, fees, licenses, and carbon trading for Gore and others

to make bizzilions of bucks.

 

http://www.climatehotmap.org/global-warming-effects/rain-and-snow.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what I don't understand.

 

Barack Obama warns climate change is the biggest threat we face yet he goes golfing all the time. Golf Courses require the use of millions of gallons of water each year and it's a huge waste.

 

Shouldn't he lead by example?

 

Here's what I don't understand, Walter hates cops, but he still lives somewhere he he benefits from their service every day.

 

Walter hates Muslims, but still uses their inventions, goods and services on a daily basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what I don't understand.

 

Barack Obama warns climate change is the biggest threat we face yet he goes golfing all the time. Golf Courses require the use of millions of gallons of water each year and it's a huge waste.

 

Shouldn't he lead by example?

You're consistently terrible but honestly this is a sort of good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good, I see that California is the first out of water.....fuck'em.

 

 

Yes, I know they grow a lot of food. We will get by without them.

 

Considering a lot of the California growing areas like the central valley depend on irrigation- sooner or later- the piper is going to have to be paid.

 

Same deal in Arizona- we've created a megalopolis like Phoenix- in the middle of a freaking desert. The Colorado River has already been sucked dry before it ever reaches the Gulf of California. Got news for those water starved areas.Teleportation of water from the Great Lakes is a few centuries off yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I should have asked what qualified scientist or scientific report said that. Not paraphrased, chain letter email quotes from science writers and politicians...

 

You don't have to be a scientist to know climate change is real. Our water supply out west is starting to get to a scary level.

 

 

You also don't have to be a scientist to know some liberal lobbyist assholes and people like Al Gore who make big bucks off this shit.

 

 

"GIVE ME MILLONS OF DOLLARS FOR THIS DROUGHT". It's embarrassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw a documentary on tv... they say in Nevada, that California is

draining more and more billions of gallons of water from the Colorado

River, and it's getting several feet lower when it gets to Nevada.

 

They showed a bijillion acres of huge spouts irragating fields.

 

That's a problem. But, when the liberal nutjobs changed their politically motivated "man made global warming"

 

to "climate change"... it was kinda like "LOOK- AN ALIEN SPACESHIP", and when doubters think

they are nutso, they say, "OH YEAH, BUT IT'S A HELICOPTER, SO WE'RE STILL RIGHT"

 

or something. It's hard to draw analogies about liberals. They emote bassackwards and gay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not doubting that politicians and others will try to take advantage of climate change for their own gain. It is when what they say gets taken as a reason to ignore the actual science behind it all together that the problem occurs

Ok since the actual political debate is "does climate change exist?" If somehow the liberals win their big victory and convince the cals of the world that it actually does exist what are we going to do about it? Specifically in the short window we've been told there is before the total destruction of our way of life?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok since the actual political debate is "does climate change exist?" If somehow the liberals win their big victory and conVince the cals of the world that it actually does exist what are we going to do about it? Specifically in the short window we've been told there is before the total destruction of our way of life?

That's the question I've been asking them for a long long time. Usually it just pisses them off.

 

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you watched the VICE episode on it they say damage to Antarctic land ice is irreversible. Even if all pollution ceased immediately. Looks like Sri Lanka will go under water. Those that live on low lying coastal areas would be wise to move inland. Thats about the size of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok since the actual political debate is "does climate change exist?" If somehow the liberals win their big victory and conVince the cals of the world that it actually does exist what are we going to do about it? Specifically in the short window we've been told there is before the total destruction of our way of life?

Everyone knows climate change exists, it existed way before man...the debate is whether or not mans miniscule contribution to the increased Co2 levels has any effect.

Prior to the industrial revolution, the Co2 level in the atmosphere was at 280 ppm. Today it is 400ppm...a measly increase of 120ppm.

Millions of years ago it was over 1000ppm.

Science cannot produce a measurable effect that the measly increase of 120ppm has on climate change...the fact is that the Co2 levels are irrelevant.

Science cannot prove the status of the climate if that extra 120ppm never happened.

 

The sun controls climate change....science that people tend to ignore.

 

Man made global warming is leftist hyperbole...a wonderful tool to help achieve the progressives dream of global redistribution of wealth.

 

 

If anyone doesn't understand PPM...parts per million...its my $999,600 to your $400 left in your savings account.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you watched the VICE episode on it they say damage to Antarctic land ice is irreversible. Even if all pollution ceased immediately. Looks like Sri Lanka will go under water. Those that live on low lying coastal areas would be wise to move inland. Thats about the size of it.

And this was caused by man?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not doubting that politicians and others will try to take advantage of climate change for their own gain. It is when what they say gets taken as a reason to ignore the actual science behind it all together that the problem occurs

The science is rightfully ignored because it is irrelevant.

 

Nothing would change if all Co2 emissions on the planet would cease today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone knows climate change exists, it existed way before man...the debate is whether or not mans miniscule contribution to the increased Co2 levels has any effect.

Prior to the industrial revolution, the Co2 level in the atmosphere was at 280 ppm. Today it is 400ppm...a measly increase of 120ppm.

Millions of years ago it was over 1000ppm.

Science cannot produce a measurable effect that the measly increase of 120ppm has on climate change...the fact is that the Co2 levels are irrelevant.

Science cannot prove the status of the climate if that extra 120ppm never happened.

 

The sun controls climate change....science that people tend to ignore.

 

Man made global warming is leftist hyperbole...a wonderful tool to help achieve the progressives dream of global redistribution of wealth.

 

 

If anyone doesn't understand PPM...parts per million...its my $999,600 to your $400 left in your savings account.

I don't care if we contributed to it or not. What do you expect us to DO about it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you watched the VICE episode on it they say damage to Antarctic land ice is irreversible. Even if all pollution ceased immediately. Looks like Sri Lanka will go under water. Those that live on low lying coastal areas would be wise to move inland. Thats about the size of it.

Antarctica is the largest continent on earth isn't it? And completely uninhabited to boot. Settling it could solve a lot of problems at least until other planets are colonized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the question I've been asking them for a long long time. Usually it just pisses them off.

 

WSS

I assume I'm part of the "them" here

 

If anything, responses like THAT piss,me off. This shit has been addressed many times. Your decision to completely ignore it doesn't equate to an inability on my end to answer. Others have responded to this multiple times as well

 

Puffing out your chest and claiming we can't answer, it pisses us off, and act like you won is Retarded. None of that happened. I guess I should be used to that coming from you by now though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume I'm part of the "them" here

 

~if the shoe fits~

 

If anything, responses like THAT piss,me off.

 

~I do understand. Anger is a natural reaction to your inability to answer intelligently.~

It's probably a lot easier to keep the conversation to whether or not global warming even exists.

 

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume I'm part of the "them" here

 

If anything, responses like THAT piss,me off. This shit has been addressed many times. Your decision to completely ignore it doesn't equate to an inability on my end to answer. Others have responded to this multiple times as well

 

Puffing out your chest and claiming we can't answer, it pisses us off, and act like you won is Retarded. None of that happened. I guess I should be used to that coming from you by now though...

Yet you're not answering the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...