Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Scientists from MIT and Princeton diss man made global warming nonsense

calfoxwc

By calfoxwc
in POLITICAL DISCUSSION

Recommended Posts

calfoxwc Grand Master

calfoxwc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/29/skeptical-climate-documentary-set-to-rock-un-climate-summit-film-to-have-red-carpet-premiere-in-paris/

 

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/616937/GLOBAL-COOLING-Decade-long-ice-age-predicted-as-sun-hibernates

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply
gftChris Newbie

gftChris

Posted
Posted

cuz fuck the scientific community.

 

 

 

Man, climatologists must be frustrated as fuck. They do all of this research, then the climate gets politicized and the dumbass public just eats it up

At least they're still allowed. Give it a republican president/congress and there'll be a ban on it like gun research at the CDC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
calfoxwc Grand Master

calfoxwc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

once again, running mouths without reading the article.

 

Featuring interviews and comments from more than 30

 

renowned

 

scientists and climate experts,

Read more: http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/29/skeptical-climate-documentary-set-to-rock-un-climate-summit-film-to-have-red-carpet-premiere-in-paris/#ixzz3sz8R7PDW

 

 

Now, it was really STUPID to smart off about "f the scientific community"

 

Sure, it only involves 30. Why reject their expertise?

 

Everybody else with any common sense knows why - "majority rules only when it's to liberals' advantage"...

 

Thanks for stopping in on another thread and making a woodypeckerhead ass of yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
calfoxwc Grand Master

calfoxwc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

consensus does not mean "fact". And, Chris,

 

it's a whole bunch of bs to say this:

 

"At least they're still allowed. Give it a republican president/congress and there'll be a ban on it like gun research at the CDC."

 

So, the current leftist extremist marxist sumbeech regime, and the UN, can fund climate change research,

and that's okay.

 

But any funding by anybody else, when the funding does not support mmgw... is very bad and partisan.

 

My, that is certainly politically expedient. Why the hell should our currently leftist ObaMao anti gun regime be allowed to direct

his CDC to do anti gun studies?

 

Seriously, that is so intellectually dishonest, you've stooped to woody's ignorant level of incompetence.

 

So, funding of gun violence and mmgw studies, are only allowed to be funded by anti -gun and pro mmgw groups and

presidential regimes.

 

And you wonder why I keep talking about the dishonest trends of liberals emotional knee jerking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gftChris Newbie

gftChris

Posted
Posted

So no examples of liberals defying scientific consensus? OK. I wasn't too hopeful on that front.

 

The ban on CDC gun research has been in place for a long time, it's not just an Obama thing, in fact it was passed in to law midway through the Clinton administration, in 1997 - with a republican congress. If republicans were so concerned that a 'corrupt liberal brainwashing' president would fix the results to how he/she wanted, they could have lifted the ban when bush came in to power, and thrown government money at trying to find a solution to the problem of gun violence. But that didn't happen.

 

 

I'm not sure why you think *only* research done by the UN is admissible in regards to global warming? Any independent research is worth consideration, and if the findings can be corroborated by others it will be entered in to the general discussion.

 

I think, however, it's fairly obvious why we should be skeptical about research funded by fossil fuel companies - they stand to lose billions if there's legislation restricting the usage of fossil fuels and will throw as much money as they can at people until they find a study they like. A little bit like in the good old days with lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Legacy Fan Newbie

Legacy Fan

Posted
Posted

The ban on CDC gun research has been in place for a long time, it's not just an Obama thing, in fact it was passed in to law midway through the Clinton administration, in 1997 - with a republican congress. If republicans were so concerned that a 'corrupt liberal brainwashing' president would fix the results to how he/she wanted, they could have lifted the ban when bush came in to power, and thrown government money at trying to find a solution to the problem of gun violence. But that didn't happen.

 

This is no longer the case. The ban was lifted nearly 3 years ago after sandy hook. The reason it's not news essentially justifies the ban in the first place. The results refute in nearly every conceivable manner the "gun control" narrative.

http://www.gunsandammo.com/politics/cdc-gun-research-backfires-on-obama/

(And yes the article contains a link to the actual study).

 

 

Good article from Time:

http://flip.it/V_-SD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...