calfoxwc Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 Getting back to the OP: We now have "president Buttock Obamola" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 23, 2014 Report Share Posted October 23, 2014 Another possible case of obamebola: http://news.yahoo.com/ebola-nyc-doctor-harlem-194023867.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted October 23, 2014 Report Share Posted October 23, 2014 Not at all. You are saying its on me to prove the number you pulled out of your ass wrong. That's Retarded. You're the only person who takes issue with that number yet you haven't told me what percentage you think gets aids that doesn't stem from a Retarded decision Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 You're the only person who takes issue with that number yet you haven't told me what percentage you think gets aids that doesn't stem from a Retarded decision I take issue with you pulling the number out of your arse and declaring it to be fact and challenging someone to prove you wrong - that's not how *anything* works. Except maybe sexual harassment cases. But, I can see what you're trying to say and the number is sufficiently high to express your point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 From the CDC: Nearly two thirds of these new infections [HIV] occurred in gay and bisexual men. So, actually some distance from 99%. It doesn't include needle sharing, but I doubt that makes up anywhere near 1/3 of cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 Sorry, forgot the source: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/basics/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 I take issue with you pulling the number out of your arse and declaring it to be fact and challenging someone to prove you wrong - that's not how *anything* works. Except maybe sexual harassment cases. But, I can see what you're trying to say and the number is sufficiently high to express your point. I'll say this again slowly for you guys. There...is...no...data...to...support...or...deny...a...percentage...of...people...that...contracted...aids...through...means...they...have...no...control...over...Only...that...its...miniscule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 From the CDC: Nearly two thirds of these new infections [HIV] occurred in gay and bisexual men. So, actually some distance from 99%. It doesn't include needle sharing, but I doubt that makes up anywhere near 1/3 of cases. 22% needle sharers. The rest through straight sex which is still something you generally have control over. Note I said 99% contract it through "Retarded decisions" leaving perhaps 1% who contract it through either rape or medical buffoonery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 Then I guess it boils down to if you think having sex is a Retarded decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 If you're having unprotected sex with random people who's history is unknown yes I would certainly call that a Retarded decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted October 24, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 One more time. The cases from heterosexual sex are almost all women who made a "Retarded decision" to have unprotected sex with a bisexual or IV drug use. So Cyskos numbers are closer if not exact. The point is? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 The point was that just saying "X% of A is B - I don't have to prove it, you prove me wrong" is about as flawed as it gets in debating. In this case, it was just being used for emphasis, as in "the vast majority" which is fine, but declaring it to be fact until proven otherwise is wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 Chris, you are quibbling about numbers, basically, Cysko nailed it. Meanwhile, another obamebola case confirmed in NY...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 Chris, you are quibbling about numbers, basically, Cysko nailed it. Meanwhile, another obamebola case confirmed in NY...... I wasn't, Woody was. My quibble is with "this number is fact, you can't disprove it therefore I'm right" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 Well, it isn't the first time I've confused you two......@@ but, back to my post: "Nothing to worry about. haha.....no reason to keep them from coming here...." New report warns of Ebola 'explosion' in Liberia...Predicts 171,000 cases in one county... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 It's worth noting cal that every patient who was brought here from africa to be treated at a qualified facility has recovered. Only a deceitful fool who knew he has been exposed and then lied about it multiple times brought it here spread it and died. I tend to think this doctor was being responsible enough to prevent an outbreak in nyc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 Absolutely correct. He was careful, and very responsible. Though, I just keep thinking that ebola could come across our open borders, per Obamao, and all heyl could break loose. Especially with shipping the illegal sumbeeches all over the country. We'll just have to hope we're all going to be safe here. But the odds could turn against us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 It's worth noting cal that every patient who was brought here from africa to be treated at a qualified facility has recovered. Only a deceitful fool who knew he has been exposed and then lied about it multiple times brought it here spread it and died. I tend to think this doctor was being responsible enough to prevent an outbreak in nyc but Obama Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 One more time. The cases from heterosexual sex are almost all women who made a "Retarded decision" to have unprotected sex with a bisexual or IV drug use. So Cyskos numbers are closer if not exact. The point is? WSS How do you know that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 Just tell your 'partner' to wear a condom before he butt fucks you Woody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted October 25, 2014 Report Share Posted October 25, 2014 Denard Robinson doesn't believe in condoms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.