Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

about ccw liability insurance - so you don't lose everything, even if you are absolutely innocent

calfoxwc

By calfoxwc
in POLITICAL DISCUSSION

Recommended Posts

calfoxwc Grand Master

calfoxwc

Posted
Posted

the way liberals use the law as a political weapon now, I have to figure out which one is

best for me. Trouble is, I hope to never have to use it, so it shouldn't cost too much.

 

https://www.ammoland.com/2017/08/concealed-carry-self-defense-insurance/?utm_source=Ammoland+Subscribers&utm_campaign=8fc2f5399e-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_08_14&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6f6fac3eaa-8fc2f5399e-20770865#axzz4ppopU0tE

Link to comment
Share on other sites
calfoxwc Grand Master

calfoxwc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I would never do a bad shoot. But even if you are completely in the right,

a corrupt liberal judge will hammer you, a corrupt liberal prosecutor

like mueller will try to destroy you anyways.

 

then there is always the frivolous civil lawsuits - regardless of how fraudulent

they are, you still could lose your house.

 

scums try to win "the lottery" that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Unsympathetic Rising Star

Unsympathetic

Posted
Posted

Mueller is neither liberal nor left.

 

You might want to look into his history - he's a Marine who earned a Bronze Star in Vietnam. He went to UVA [one of the best schools in the South..] and has throughout his career been NONpolitical. He is personally credited with transforming the FBI from purely law enforcement to its current world-class counterespionage/counterterrorism focus.

 

 

Unless, of course, if by "liberal" you mean "someone who does something that I don't understand."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
calfoxwc Grand Master

calfoxwc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Mueller is neither liberal nor left.

 

You might want to look into his history - he's a Marine who earned a Bronze Star in Vietnam. He went to UVA [one of the best schools in the South..] and has throughout his career been NONpolitical. He is personally credited with transforming the FBI from purely law enforcement to its current world-class counterespionage/counterterrorism focus.

 

 

Unless, of course, if by "liberal" you mean "someone who does something that I don't understand."

wrong. he was a best friend of comey, who leaked docs to get a special prosecutor, and he got his best friend.

Mueller should have recused himself from being special prosecutor just for that. THEN, after wrongly accepting

the position, and making himself look corrupt and flat out trying to GET Trump for Comey, who Trump justly fired,

Corrupt Mueller hired several staunch clinton supporters.

Nothing like doubling down on the dishonesty and conflict of interest, eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
calfoxwc Grand Master

calfoxwc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Mueller is neither liberal nor left.

 

You might want to look into his history - he's a Marine who earned a Bronze Star in Vietnam. He went to UVA [one of the best schools in the South..] and has throughout his career been NONpolitical. He is personally credited with transforming the FBI from purely law enforcement to its current world-class counterespionage/counterterrorism focus.

 

 

Unless, of course, if by "liberal" you mean "someone who does something that I don't understand."

 

even a former FBI agent agrees with me.

 

http://www.theblaze.com/podcasts/former-fbi-agent-lays-out-why-mueller-needs-to-recuse-himself-as-special-counsel/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
calfoxwc Grand Master

calfoxwc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I mean "liberal" to mean left-leaning and emotionally kneejerk dishonest.

 

Say, let's do look and Mueller's history:

 

http://patriotjournal.com/robert-mueller-disqualified-from-trump-investigation-after-criminal-ties-to-hillary-go-public/

 

Robert Mueller Faces Scrutiny In Trump Investigation After Ties To Hillary Go Public

 

We are currently six full months into the Trump presidency.

Much has been changing in this country, from healthcare, to immigration policy, to foreign policy. What has stayed the same, however, is the Left’s rabid Russia witch hunt.

No matter how much evidence proves the contrary, liberals insist that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia before, during, and after the 2016 election.

This, of course, is not true. There is no evidence that either Trump or any of his people worked with Russia to beat Hillary Clinton.

Nevertheless, the Left and its allies in the deep state appointed former FBI director Robert Mueller as Special Counsel to come up with something to hurt the President.

The Left is putting a lot of faith in Mueller to help their cause. What they do not know is that damaging information about Mueller’s past has been revealed.

This will certainly come back to haunt Mueller and his liberal friends:

From The Angry Patriot:

Now that even some leading Democrats have begun to question the idea that Donald Trump and Moscow somehow “colluded” in order to win the 2016 election, the whole purpose of a Special Counsel seems moot. Furthermore, given Robert Mueller’s past, one must wonder why he’s even allowed to investigate President Trump.

Back in 2006, the Justice Department found evidence that Mueller, then the FBI Director, falsified testimony about the bureau’s surveillance on an anti-war protest in 2002. Specifically, the DoJ discovered that Mueller improperly opened and expanded investigations into certain Left-wing groups (via Mercury News).

In connection with the 2006 investigation into the FBI’s illegal surveillance of an anti-war protest in Pittsburgh, Mueller committed perjury by claiming the FBI was conducting an anti-terrorism investigation into The Thomas Merton Center, a pacifist Catholic organization (via Got News).

Mueller’s bipartisanship seems doubtful given that his law firm worked with the Left-wing Civis Analytics as recently as 2014-2015 (via Got News).

Many have also noted that Mueller has staffed his Russian probe team with many Hillary Clinton donors (via The Daily Caller).

No one should be surprised that Mueller is dishonest. After all, he took the blatantly partisan Special Counsel job even though he knew full well that Trump did nothing wrong.

What is surprising, however, is the extent of Mueller’s dishonesty.

Everyone knew about the Obama and Clinton operatives on Mueller’s team. Patriot Journal reported on those revelations when the information became public last week.

No one knew about Mueller’s history of perjury, though. The FBI surveillance scandal was also kept secret very well.

Apparently, then-FBI Director Mueller ordered several investigations that targeted peaceful anti-war protest groups. Mueller’s FBI also placed numerous activists on terrorist watch lists, even if there was no evidence to support those allegations.

When confronted by the Senate, Mueller gave a misleading testimony. He said the FBI was targeting a specific terror suspect at an anti-war rally, when the truth is that Mueller simply wanted to surveil the event.

Indeed, Mueller is not to be trusted.

Robert Mueller is a power-hungry crook who uses positions of authority to pervert justice for personal gain. Worse, whenever he gets caught, he lies about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
calfoxwc Grand Master

calfoxwc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

gets even worse:

 

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/450230/rod-rosenstein-mueller-investigation-claims-its-limited-dont-stand

 

Don't miss the part about crime evidence warrants the special prosecutor, he doesn't get to be appointment

to investigate to see if he can find some evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...