Orion

Possibly. But I don't think that 6th & 7th round picks have much 'move up' value at the draft. They do seem to have some value before and during the season when trading for a player. (moreso for the 6th round picks) The 2025 draft is obviously a long time off but I don't see the Browns wanting to draft 10 players...especially with 6 of 'em coming in the final 2 rounds of the draft. I mean, that's 20% of a team (almost).

6 picks in the bottom two rounds. Not much to get excited about there. I'm thinking that some of those picks will be traded away before next April.

Ya know, I never watch pregame shows. I turn on a football game when it's time for kick-off. But that's just me.

I understand the power of benching the player. It's humiliating. But I just don't like punishing the whole rest of the team, which is what taking out your starting QB does. The fine affects just the player. I would just tell Watson, If you take on tacklers instead of sliding we're going to fine you and we're going to let Roger GoToHell calculate the dollar amount.

^ Thank you. I've said pretty much that, except I chose to Fine and not bench the player.

As it relates to the QB I would prefer RPO be PROB. Pass, if ya can't pass then Run and slide if it's safe, or throw it OB.

Why is it sticking in my craw that somewhere I read Stef commenting on Winston and saying something like he's much more capable on the move than people think?

Maybe you're right. But I'm not sure it matters....because I don't think that Haslem & DePo care what fits Stef better. I think those two have their vision and Berry & Stef have to march in that direction. - Plus, Flacco is too old to hitch a wagon to.

Ya know, I just don't think that they entertained that idea. Flacco is a very old school QB. As much as I (perhaps you, and others) would like/love that, it doesn't match the current organizational mindset. They want backup QB's to have traits to more match Watson and the rpo style.

Yes. This trade was modelled after the Rams Mathew Stafford trade. You're built to win now, but you don't have faith in your QB. There's no way to draft one, so trade for a proven talent. And like everything else, it's a great call if it works. Last year at this time we had people predicting that Stef would be fired at the end of the season if Watson did not perform well. But somehow, with defense and smart coaching he won games while alternating two pathetic QB's. And then he altered his offense to accommodate Joe Flacco's game. Great work by Stef. But Trigger Finger Haslem still owns the team so It's possible that Stef only kicked the can down the road. Two of our top superstars (Watson & Chubb) are coming off of injuries & surgeries. We've brought in RB's to cover for Chubb...but there's only so much you can do to cover for your championship caliber QB. Without your championship QB, you're not a championship contender. This will be the 3rd season for Watson. Third time is the charm, right? Super Bowl Browns.....Yeah!

Wow. And he was 6'3 with quite a large strike zone.

So, we traded a 1st & a 4th round pick for Watson. Then we threw in some extra picks and they threw in a pick. Certainly sounds better than three 1st rounders. Anywho, we're paid in full (outside of his salaries) on the investment. Now, we continue to wait for a return on the investment. And we can get back in the business of drafting on Thursday nights. Perhaps even drafting a QB in round 1. I mean, we can't see the future. There's a non zero chance that Watson never returns to form. After all, he did screw up his throwing shoulder.

I think there's a litany of QB's that set us back a decade. Hell, we should probably be back in the 18th century by now.

The Browns will receive Watson and a 2024 sixth-round draft choice (which was originally a fifth-round pick), while the Texans will receive a 2022 first-round pick (No. 13 overall), 2023 and 2024 first-round picks, a 2022 fourth-round choice (No. 107), a third-round pick in 2023 and a fourth-round pick in 2024.

Did that really happen? I totally missed that. So he had a little 'Billy' thing goin' on?