calfoxwc Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 Well, He is talking about it. Idiot. Anybody want to agree with that? If not, here's a link: http://www.lcaction.cc/682/petition.asp?rid=41043047&PID=&P=1&Ref_ID=25705#N1&IP=76.244.148.36 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 Is there any info about the bill or executive order involved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 Yeah, any info? And doesn't our current internet oversight committee know nothing about the internet? "Series of tubes". They have no real technical experience Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 A petition??? Gosh it almost seems as if someone believes Obama gives a fuck. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 A petition and who the hell knows if they are just protesting a bill or executive order that doesn't exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted April 4, 2014 Report Share Posted April 4, 2014 Good... you do realize it has not been controlled by the US gov for 15 years right? ICANN is a private company that has been managing the DNS systems(based out of califorina) and for them to do business in the US they have to still follow are laws and regulation.http://www.fiercegovernmentit.com/story/cutting-icann-cord-ntia-benefits-us-interests-says-strickling/2014-04-02 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 Except your site says this: "Removing the vestige of direct U.S. control over the DNS will deflate an argument that the multistakeholder process is a screen for American domination, say those in favor of doing so." And believing a multi-country control over the internet as a good model is dimwitted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 God forbid if China gets control of the internet. No porn. I don't know what's worse...no porn in China or porn with blurred out genitals like Japan. What's the point, Japan, what's the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 7, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Think of it this way - how many communist countries dominate their media? They control every bit of content? State run? With control over the internet, they could further do things that they don't want the world to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted April 9, 2014 Report Share Posted April 9, 2014 I don't even know where to start.... you do understand what the internet is right? There really is no way for one government to force their type of censorship on another, especially one the size of ours, nor will there be. Countries such as China will continue to filter sites at a national level, the only thing that will change is how DNS addresses are assigned, and allow more nations to have an input going further for how domain names are determined and when to switch from ipv4/ipv6 to the next version. People/countries perceive that the US is dictating how it has been done since for years a fully owned US company has made the rules for who gets a .gov or a .com(etc.). But since Obama did it, it must be wrong and horrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 9, 2014 Report Share Posted April 9, 2014 so other people/countries have no reason to believe the United States is dictating anything as you say at the end? Right? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted April 9, 2014 Report Share Posted April 9, 2014 so other people/countries have no reason to believe the United States is dictating anything as you say at the end? Right? WSS The US company does not dictate what content is on the site itself but what determines what type of sites get .net or .com(etc), some countries felt that was dictating since no other country had input into the system and with the coming switch of top level domains from .com to .whatever it is more important that other countries input is heard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 9, 2014 Report Share Posted April 9, 2014 but what I want to know is, is their own concern merely paranoia? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted April 9, 2014 Report Share Posted April 9, 2014 but what I want to know is, is their own concern merely paranoia? WSS Partially, mostly its a preventive paranoia in regards to the upcoming change that I describe. When the change occurs there will need to be a group who decides what company gets top level domains such as .cars or .sports and other countries don't want to see only a US based country deciding who should control these names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 9, 2014 Report Share Posted April 9, 2014 Of course, homer that I am, I'm all for that. So... It's most likely exaggerated anyway but still I tend to err on the side of the US. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted April 9, 2014 Report Share Posted April 9, 2014 Being afraid of another country forcing their censorship on another country is ridiculous they can't even get sites like thepiratebay, wikileaks, or lemonparty off of the internet, I wouldn't worry about places like the Drudge being effected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted April 14, 2014 Report Share Posted April 14, 2014 Being afraid of another country forcing their censorship on another country is ridiculous they can't even get sites like thepiratebay, wikileaks, or lemonparty off of the internet, I wouldn't worry about places like the Drudge being effected. Piratebay and the rest have been banned at ISP level in the UK. Which means no torrents! Unless you go to anyone of a thousand sites that have popped up to circumvent the problem. Or spoof your IP address. Or buy a server in a country with no laws on internet (like sweden). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.