calfoxwc Posted September 23, 2014 Report Share Posted September 23, 2014 It's how they accrue wealth and power, by "organizing". But we mentioned it years ago. Here's the latest: http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-saul-alinsky-letters-155526953.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
htownbrown Posted September 23, 2014 Report Share Posted September 23, 2014 First published in 1971, Rules for Radicals is Saul Alinsky's impassioned counsel to young radicals on how to effect constructive social change and know “the difference between being a realistic radical and being a rhetorical one.” Written in the midst of radical political developments whose direction Alinsky was one of the first to question, this volume exhibits his style at its best. Like Thomas Paine before him, Alinsky was able to combine, both in his person and his writing, the intensity of political engagement with an absolute insistence on rational political discourse and adherence to the American democratic tradition. __________________________________ I probably don't know as much on the subject as you do Cal, as I was a tadpole in a scrotum (or an underdeveloped human being to the spiritually motivated), but nothing points to this 'scandal' being so egregious. I mean the overview from his book doesn't seem as far out there as you seem to view it. The rebelious stuff he is linked to seems pretty tame all things considered. A 'fart-in'....really?? You do realize his references to lucifer was a joke right? Don't get me wrong, I would never vote for Hillary, but I don't see how this could be turned against her for Republican gain. Is it just to catch her in a lie, or what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted September 23, 2014 Report Share Posted September 23, 2014 Neocons load their underwear up whenever Alinsky's name is spoken. The TV told them to be afraid. Be prepared for lots of doomsday "we saw this coming" banter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 23, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2014 The manipulation by devious means is what tells me that this higgardly is not to be trusted for who she is, anymore than Obamao should have been trusted to be who he really was as pres. He was very much nearly opposite. A stealth radical, who is alienating most Americans, and many of those being dems. He's a failure. They both studied Alinski, and they both should be understood to consider cloward-piven as a legit, leftist desired philosphy. That bodes ill for our country. Look at the throwing of billions, even trillions, of red ink, into the mix, including all the illegal sombeeches who are going to get SS, welfare, and whatever else Obamao and the dems need to give them for eternal votes for ...dems. Oh, and Obamaocare. It's a fiasco that we couldn't afford, but no dem would listen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 23, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2014 Speaking of Cloward-Piven........ we are already deep in red ink.... http://www.latintimes.com/immigration-news-new-wave-central-american-kids-will-reach-us-soon-according-experts-263152 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.