calfoxwc Posted January 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 has to do with the committee. Grassley compromised - to deny them their phoney testimony would be used as a rallying point for dems to come together to vote against Sessions out of "principle". Grassley denied them that. If you heard them testify, it was a "witch trial" of bigoted racist haters.... referring to Lewis and Booker being two of them. Their innuendo and slurring was childish, and pointless. They had no legit reasons for making their dubious claims. They made asses of themselves playing the race card for no good reason. Dirty politics isn't a good reason. http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/sessions-confirmation-hearing-black-lawmakers-233348 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbluhm86 Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Yeah, I have no idea where the Democrats got the precedent to try and hold up confirmation hearings from: https://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/obama-has-waited-longer-for-cabinet-confirmations-than-any-other-recent-president/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 more uncomfortable facts for deceptical to dance around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Yeah, I have no idea where the Democrats got the precedent to try and hold up confirmation hearings from: https://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/obama-has-waited-longer-for-cabinet-confirmations-than-any-other-recent-president/ It's worth noting, but I assume you won't, that an Obama nominee also has the shortest wait time on the list. Perhaps Loretta lynch was simply objectionable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted January 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 obaMao put leftist activists all over our gov. Van Jones, for instance, was one of his WH advisors. That tells the tale of a traitor right there. Of course Lynch was corrupt and should never have been there. But that is obaMao. Racist anti-American hating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Osiris Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 It's worth noting, but I assume you won't, that an Obama nominee also has the shortest wait time on the list. Perhaps Loretta lynch was simply objectionable It's also worth noting that you've pointed out an outlier to the original point, and if we take the average time to appoint for democratic nominees and compared them to Republican nominees you'd have a significant longer time for Democrats. Since I'm not going to sit here and calculate the obvious, let's just look at the top 10 longest and 10 shortest. Of the 10 longest, only 2 were Republican nominees. Of the 10 shortest, only 3 were Democrat nominees. Why is that, do you all think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Hopefully the d ms stonewall some of these clowns trump is trying to get in. I mean some of em are ok but jeesus ive been reading about some of these people and its like srsly? The tllierson appt looks reasonable compared to some of these other goofs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Too lazy to look it all up which ones had a House and Senate in the opposite party? When Obama had a democratic House and Senate did his nominees take especially long? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Osiris Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Too lazy to look it all up which ones had a House and Senate in the opposite party? When Obama had a democratic House and Senate did his nominees take especially long? WSS That's a good point. Also too lazy to look it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Lots of google lazy fucks up im here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Lots of google lazy fucks up im hereOkay. You go through every presidential appointment find the date and look up the exact ratio of Republicans to Democrats in the House and Senate. I'll expect a report on my desk before you go home tonight. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Okay. You go through every presidential appointment find the date and look up the exact ratio of Republicans to Democrats in the House and Senate. I'll expect a report on my desk before you go home tonight. WSS Hey im the one gainfully employed, how bout u turn off ellen eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Hey im the one gainfully employed, how bout u turn off ellen eh? Homophobe WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Homophobe WSS I know i know, its tough to pull urself away when she starts dancing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.