FRONT PAGE    SPORTS BOARD  Hop To Forum Categories  Political Discussion    McCain's radical buddy
Page 1 2 3 4 
Go
New
Find
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Skipper of the Lake Erie Booze Patrol
Ring of Honor
Picture of Westside Steve
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Well, he was. We were talking about how Al Gore recommended that the Congress not ratify Kyoto. He was against making the Kyoto treaty US law.

Care to admit you were wrong about that?


Nope.
I called it "Al Gore's dumbass Kyoto scam."
It is.
Read his own bullshit.
WSS
 
Posts: 2677 | Location: Norton Ohio USA | Registered: Mon September 15 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Skipper of the Lake Erie Booze Patrol
Ring of Honor
Picture of Westside Steve
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Do you see how stupid it makes you look when you continually accuse me of making false statements, and gloating over them, and it turns out you're the one who is wrong?

And why doesn't that ever stop you?



Not at all.
You're full of shit on both issues and spinning.
Anyone with a brain sees it.
(no not those two)

So to recap.
No the vast majority of people who pay capital gains are NOT wealthy.
Kyoto IS Al Gore's dumbass scam.
He helped "fashion it" as Vice President.
His own words.
Probably between re inventing government and inventing the internet.
WSS
 
Posts: 2677 | Location: Norton Ohio USA | Registered: Mon September 15 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
Steve, you dolt (really, there's no other word for it anymore), you're wrong. The vast majority of capital gains taxes are paid by the wealthy. Saying that the wealthy are "regular people" is hysterical, really it is. But that doesn't change the fact that the vast majority of capital gains taxes are paid by the wealthy. Either they do or they don't. And they do. We've got numbers and facts and figures that tell us this is true.

You're wrong.

Next, you accused me of being wrong when I said that Al Gore was against the Kyoto treaty. Now, either he was or he wasn't. Whether you called it "Al Gore's dumbass Kyoto scam" is irrelevant, much like saying that the vast majority of people who pay CG taxes are "regular people" and therefore not wealthy. They don't address the issue, which is why this is really funny.

But it's factually true that when Kyoto was brought to the US Congress for ratification, Al Gore urged that we vote against it.

Care to admit you were wrong on either of these? Or are you now going to say I'm wrong because wealthy people are "really cool", and Al Gore's a loser, and then accuse me of spinning?
 
Posts: 5010 | Registered: Wed September 28 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
AFC North Player of the Month
Posted Hide Post
Even someone like Senator Kerry voted for the Byrd-Hagel Resolution, which states:
quote:
Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--

(1) the United States should not be a signatory to any protocol to, or other agreement regarding, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change of 1992, at negotiations in Kyoto in December 1997, or thereafter, which would--

(A) mandate new commitments to limit or reduce greenhouse gas emissions for the Annex I Parties, unless the protocol or other agreement also mandates new specific scheduled commitments to limit or reduce greenhouse gas emissions for Developing Country Parties within the same compliance period, or

(B) would result in serious harm to the economy of the United States; and

(2) any such protocol or other agreement which would require the advice and consent of the Senate to ratification should be accompanied by a detailed explanation of any legislation or regulatory actions that may be required to implement the protocol or other agreement and should also be accompanied by an analysis of the detailed financial costs and other impacts on the economy of the United States which would be incurred by the implementation of the protocol or other agreement.
 
Posts: 865 | Registered: Tue January 29 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Skipper of the Lake Erie Booze Patrol
Ring of Honor
Picture of Westside Steve
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Steve, you dolt (really, there's no other word for it anymore), you're wrong. The vast majority of capital gains taxes are paid by the wealthy.


That's not what you said, dolt.
You said the vast majority of people who pay cap gains are wealthy.
That is a lie if you need to stick with it.
A misstatement if you don't.

So to recap.
No the vast majority of people who pay capital gains are NOT wealthy.
Kyoto IS Al Gore's dumbass scam.
He helped "fashion it" as Vice President.
His own words.
Do you deny that?
Probably between re inventing government and inventing the internet.

Dolt.
WSS
 
Posts: 2677 | Location: Norton Ohio USA | Registered: Mon September 15 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Skipper of the Lake Erie Booze Patrol
Ring of Honor
Picture of Westside Steve
Posted Hide Post
quote:
(B) would result in serious harm to the economy of the United States; and


No kidding.
And I posted Gore's own blather in which he brags about "fashioning" it and urges ratification of the piece of shit.
WSS
 
Posts: 2677 | Location: Norton Ohio USA | Registered: Mon September 15 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
AFC North Player of the Month
Posted Hide Post
From December 11, 1997:
quote:
Pulling in the developing nations

Gore, who often serves as the administration's point person on environmental issues, said the U.S. intends to press for "meaningful participation by key developing nations." Until that happens, the administration will not seek a ratification vote in the Senate, Gore said.

"As we said from the very beginning, we will not submit this agreement for ratification until key developing nations participate in this effort," Gore declared. "This is a global problem that will require a global solution."

The U.S. plans bilateral talks with key developing nations, he said.
 
Posts: 865 | Registered: Tue January 29 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Skipper of the Lake Erie Booze Patrol
Ring of Honor
Picture of Westside Steve
Posted Hide Post
Letter from Al Gore supporting the
People’s Ratification of Kyoto



Dear Friends,

On the website for the film, An Inconvenient Truth, www.climatecrisis.net, I wrote earlier this year: “Humanity is sitting on a ticking time bomb. If the vast majority of the world's scientists are right, we have just ten years to avert a major catastrophe that could send our entire planet into a tail-spin of epic destruction involving extreme weather, floods, droughts, epidemics and killer heat waves beyond anything we have ever experienced.”

The film has now become the #3 top-performing documentary in history, and the book of the same title has been on the NYT bestseller list for more than four months. The reception to my message about global warming and the urgency to deploy solutions has been gratifying. While I am doing what I can to spread awareness about the climate crisis and its solutions, others are spearheading much-need citizen actions. One such organization is CCC – the Climate Crisis Coalition (www.climatecrisiscoalition.org). By emphasizing not only the environmental aspects of global warming but also the corresponding issues of social and economic equity, they are helping us build a more diverse and stronger movement.

I am writing today to urge you to sign and help circulate CCC’s People’s Ratification of the Kyoto Global Warming Treaty petition. I recently signed the petition and hope you will do so as well.

My support for this petition comes from a unique perspective. As Vice President I helped fashion the Kyoto Protocol. As a candidate for President, I tried to make international cooperation on climate change a central concern. Now, at this critical juncture, the rest of the world needs to know that millions of U.S. citizens support the Kyoto Protocol, even if the current administration does not. The evidence for this rests on an extraordinary, if under-publicized, range of emission-limiting activities undertaken by more than 295 cities, some 44 states and countless numbers of universities. Many thousands of signatures on the People’s Ratification will add to this momentum. It is critical that this groundswell of activity be put squarely in front of all our candidates, both incumbents and challengers, in this year’s midterm elections for the 110th Congress.

Please join me, in signing the People’s Ratification. You can sign online (as I have) at www.kyotoandbeyond.org or you can print the petition from the site, collect signatures on paper copies and send them to the CCC address provided.



Sincerely Yours,



Al Gore.

P.S. I also recommend the CCC's website for information about what they and other activists are doing; for their Climate Crisis News Engine (a great source of breaking climate stories from around the globe); and as a way to sign up for the free CCC Newsfeed, a valuable summary of climate-related developments. And also visit www.theclimateproject.org, the site to learn about the program to train 1,000 committed individuals to take a version of my global warming slide presentation into their home communities.
 
Posts: 2677 | Location: Norton Ohio USA | Registered: Mon September 15 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Skipper of the Lake Erie Booze Patrol
Ring of Honor
Picture of Westside Steve
Posted Hide Post
Ten years boys.
Savege, you had better get this ship aright!!!!!!!!!1
WSS
Browns Win
 
Posts: 2677 | Location: Norton Ohio USA | Registered: Mon September 15 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
AFC North Player of the Month
Posted Hide Post
You got me, WSS. Gore believes that 1) We should join the Kyoto process; and 2) that process should include developing nations.

Those two things are completely irreconcilable.
 
Posts: 865 | Registered: Tue January 29 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
Steve, you're not doing yourself any favors here.

No one is suggesting that Al Gore didn't work on the Kyoto treaty as vice president. We pointed out that you didn't know know that Gore wasn't satisfied with the outcome and urged that we vote against it back in 1998.

You still don't seem to get that. Do you get that part?
 
Posts: 5010 | Registered: Wed September 28 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Skipper of the Lake Erie Booze Patrol
Ring of Honor
Picture of Westside Steve
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Steve, you're not doing yourself any favors here.

No one is suggesting that Al Gore didn't work on the Kyoto treaty as vice president. We pointed out that you didn't know know that Gore wasn't satisfied with the outcome and urged that we vote against it back in 1998.

You still don't seem to get that. Do you get that part?


Red herring.
It was his baby then and lilely a bigger piece of shit today.
And it's still his baby.
Even moreso.

Right?


WSS
 
Posts: 2677 | Location: Norton Ohio USA | Registered: Mon September 15 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
Do you accept that yes, he worked on the treaty, then urged Congress not to sign it because it exempted countries we needed in the treaty?

Can you keep those two thoughts in your head at once? Please give us a sign.
 
Posts: 5010 | Registered: Wed September 28 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Westside Steve:
quote:
Steve, you dolt (really, there's no other word for it anymore), you're wrong. The vast majority of capital gains taxes are paid by the wealthy.


That's not what you said, dolt.
You said the vast majority of people who pay cap gains are wealthy.
That is a lie if you need to stick with it.
A misstatement if you don't.

So to recap.
No the vast majority of people who pay capital gains are NOT wealthy.
Kyoto IS Al Gore's dumbass scam.
He helped "fashion it" as Vice President.
His own words.
Do you deny that?
Probably between re inventing government and inventing the internet.

Dolt.
WSS


Hey steve I been listening to your bullshit rhetoric for seven years and you never attached any numbers to any of bullshit

how bout providing some facts just once to back up your intolerant mindless one sided rants........

Let me give you a hint to start......names some positives about the misguided failing Bush Admin

and I will rip them them to shreads with numbers NOT BULLSHIT
 
Posts: 1928 | Location: Waywayfar Outer, SPC | Registered: Thu September 18 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Skipper of the Lake Erie Booze Patrol
Ring of Honor
Picture of Westside Steve
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aloysius:
You got me, WSS. Gore believes that 1) We should join the Kyoto process; and 2) that process should include developing nations.

Those two things are completely irreconcilable.


What does that mean, Alo?

I don't think those two things are irreconcilable (in theory at least) at all and B I think Gore would love both to happen.

Personally I think Kyoto is a piece of crap with or without "developing nations."
That does not mean that I'm right OR that it is not Gores aim.

So I don't know what the disagreement is.
WSS
 
Posts: 2677 | Location: Norton Ohio USA | Registered: Mon September 15 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
AFC North Player of the Month
Posted Hide Post
Steve,

I don't think it's a caricature of your position to say that you don't think reducing greenhouse gases is possible because we're all too selfish to do anything about it.

Otherwise, I don't see much of a reason to oppose Gore's vision of Kyoto: one in which all nations reduce their emissions.

The world is better off, and we're not sacrificing our economic competitiveness to achieve it.

There's an interesting debate on how to reduce emissions: Heck and I would like to replace at least part of our current tax system with a carbon tax, while Tupa prefers a cap and trade solution.

But I don't think it's presumptuous to say that the debate over whether we need to reduce emissions is over (Sorry, Cal). Additionally, there isn't much debate over whether it's possible to reduce emissions.

The real question is over what should be our target level of emissions and what's the most efficient way to get to that target.

It's a complex debate - one that I don't understand as well as I'd like - but that's where the discussion is heading. And labeling Kyoto "a piece of crap" doesn't make you a part of it.
 
Posts: 865 | Registered: Tue January 29 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
Damnit to hell, Al, quite being all sensible, competent, and informed! This is the place for Cal to call to coin phrases like "goober warming" and "Hitlery" and for Steve to then insist that Cal is NOT an idiot!

Just stop it, man.
 
Posts: 13603 | Registered: Sat September 13 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
Ha. Seriously.
 
Posts: 5010 | Registered: Wed September 28 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Pro Bowl Player
Picture of DieHardBrownsFan
Posted Hide Post
Al, you do sound smart, so take my advise, you don't want Shep as an ally. He will turn on you in a New York Minute for his own delusional feelings of superiority. (He thinks he is smarter and more clever then anyone, including you).
 
Posts: 793 | Location: Cuyahoga County | Registered: Mon September 18 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Skipper of the Lake Erie Booze Patrol
Ring of Honor
Picture of Westside Steve
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I don't think it's a caricature of your position to say that you don't think reducing greenhouse gases is possible because we're all too selfish to do anything about it.

Correct Alo.
I think that's a pretty fair take.
"We're" also includes the rest of the world.
I don't see any country getting rich from manufacturing seriously cutting back.
I don't see much chance of making the Amazon a world "park" and stipping the destruction of the rain forest.
I don't see any support at all for a major cutback on meat production.
I personally have no wish to live like the Japanese.
I like big houses heating and air conditioning lots of space and driving when and where I like.
So does everyone here I'd bet. Even Sev, who resists much of that temptation would prefer it if environmentally possible.




Otherwise, I don't see much of a reason to oppose Gore's vision of Kyoto: one in which all nations reduce their emissions.


My opinion of Kyoto isn't what I'm talking about here.
It is what it is, whether or not anyone agrees.

What I'm saying is that it's been Al Gore's pet since he was VP.
It has. And that has absolutely nothing to do with my opinion of it's workability.
Do you agree with that or not?
The only reason he had temporary qualms is that he didn't get the worldwide participation he wanted.
Do you agree with that or not?


That's where Hecks red herring swims in.
Don't chase it just read what I say.
My particular opposition to Kyoto isn't the argument.
It's whether or not Al Gore has been a proponent since he was VP.

WSS
 
Posts: 2677 | Location: Norton Ohio USA | Registered: Mon September 15 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4  
 

FRONT PAGE    SPORTS BOARD  Hop To Forum Categories  Political Discussion    McCain's radical buddy

Designed by: CreAtens