FRONT PAGE    SPORTS BOARD  Hop To Forum Categories  Political Discussion    Jindal performs exorcisms
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 

Moderators: Admin, Chicopee John
Go
New
Find
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Skipper of the Lake Erie Booze Patrol
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Picture of Westside Steve
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aloysius:
I'm not Catholic, so I don't consider myself a great authority on who is and who isn't a member of the faith.

But if someone told me that he believed in the Nicene Creed but disagreed with the Church's position on limbo or another arcane theological issue, I wouldn't say, "Sorry, you're not Catholic."

Steve, would you say that people like Pat Buchanan who reject much of the Church's Vatican II teaching aren't Catholics?


Sorry Alo.
I guess my take is the same.
I'm not asking anyone to believe anything.
But there is a certain set of beliefs that makes you a particular religion.
Or not.

Did you want to take a shot at my question?
WSS
 
Posts: 5751 | Location: Norton Ohio USA | Registered: Mon September 15 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Hall of Fame Legend
Posted Hide Post
Um, what's the question again? Whether some beliefs can be fundamental to the faith while others aren't?

If that's the question, then I'd say yes.

I don't know enough about Catholic theology and the current state of the Church to know what would be considered a fundamental principle of faith. But I imagine that the Nicene Creed would be where you'd start:
quote:
We believe in one God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds, God of God, Light of Light, Very God of Very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father by whom all things were made; who for us men, and for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the Virgin Mary, and was made man, and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate. He suffered and was buried, and the third day he rose again according to the Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of the Father. And he shall come again with glory to judge both the quick and the dead, whose kingdom shall have no end.

And we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life, who proceedeth from the Father and the Son, who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified, who spoke by the prophets. And we believe one holy catholic and apostolic Church. We acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins. And we look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.
 
Posts: 2183 | Registered: Tue January 29 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
Steve, once again, has changed the subject.

His idea that you believe it all otherwise you're not Catholic - and a liar - doesn't stand up to much scrutiny. It's laughable, and no member of the Catholic laity would be excommunicated or even denied communion if they didn't agree with, say, the Church's position on women in the priesthood.

So now we're going to pretend that he really just meant the Immaculate Conception. Fancy that.

Whether something is a more central tenet to the faith, or something more incidental or constructed by the Catholic hierarchy is not a concern of Steve's. Because he can't tell two unlike things apart.

But to answer your question, having been out with friends all day, yes, one can be Catholic and not believe in the Immaculate Conception. The Immaculate Conception is a 19th century creation of the church, not something drawn directly from the Bible.

No one is going to be excommunicated or denied Communion for that either.

Now, Steve is free to believe what he wishes - that if you belong to a religion you must believe in everything the religion teaches. So long as he knows that this world only exists in his head.
 
Posts: 8185 | Registered: Wed September 28 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
Alo, I had to say that thing for years, every Sunday. Still know every word, even though it's been years since I stepped into a church. Funny how they like to drill that into your head before you even know what it means.

And that version is the old one, I think. We Catholics and former Catholics will tell you it's "of all that is seen and unseen" and not "of all things visible and invisible."

"...begotten of the Father before all worlds" is not in there anymore. "Very God of Very God" isn't either.

"...to judge the quick and the dead" sounds cool, but they say "to judge the living and the dead" now.

The whole thing is slightly different. Same idea, though.

I guess it was instructive in one sense. I remember it suddenly dawning on me one Sunday - "Wait a minute ...I don't believe a word of this crap."
 
Posts: 8185 | Registered: Wed September 28 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Hall of Fame Legend
Posted Hide Post
Okay - I'm glad I put in that "I don't know anything about Catholicism" exclaimer.

The last time I was in a Catholic church was in Vilnius five years ago, so my familiarity with the English-language service is pretty weak.
 
Posts: 2183 | Registered: Tue January 29 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
Ha. Consider yourself blessed.
 
Posts: 8185 | Registered: Wed September 28 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Pro Bowl Player
Picture of damajuki
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by heckofajobBrownie:
I guess it was instructive in one sense. I remember is suddenly dawning on me one Sunday - "Wait a minute ...I don't believe a word of this crap."

And there it is in a nutshell. That the core beliefs of the Catholic Church are "crap" is probably how you actually feel. That makes me sad for you.

Heck, I don't care about the essay nor your newest round of bickering with Steve nearly as much as I care about your obvious issue with Catholicism and faith in general.

I don't know what happened to you in your life that has so embittered you towards issues of faith and religion but whatever it was, I hope you deal with it. You need peace with it, brother.

Because the theme of your questions about faith and attacks on the faithful is consistent: you KNOW things, you are RATIONAL, and you are SUPERIOR because of your knowledge. It's all about YOU and what YOU can discern and it's all very rational and intellectual and you are very proud of your intelligence.

But understanding our human existence is beyond the simply rational. There are things we do not and cannot know only through our physical senses and intellectual abilities. Faith in SOMETHING is as essentially human as the ability to be rational, and just as fundamental, heck.

For whatever reason, I think you are missing that. I'd love to hear your thoughts on why that is.
 
Posts: 1065 | Location: Durham, NC | Registered: Sat February 17 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
My peace came from losing organized religion, brother. It was a clarifying series of moments. I recommend it highly.

And I'd agree with you at the end there. There's a lot we don't know. And the more you learn, the more you realize you don't know. One of those things I'm quite sure I don't know is what happens when you die. And I'm quite sure you don't know either.

And I'd also agree that the idea of "faith" is something very human, and its very constant. That does not, however, oblige me to believe in or agree with the particular aspects of a certain "faith", or any faith. I don't think that's even that controversial - I'm sure you could think of lots of faiths whose beliefs you'd find hard to stomach. You might even find them ridiculous.

And I'd also agree that my disagreements with Steve are beyond tiresome.

As for faith, I've got faith in lots of things. None of them involve the supernatural, however.

But I do always wonder where religious people get the nerve to ask everyone to take their incredible claims (virgin births, hell, returning saviors, etc.) at face value, while the absence of those beliefs is something I need to change, something that must be born out of some pain that I need to deal with, and something you feel bad for.

Really, you don't need to feel bad. I'm quite alright. None of my priests touched me in the special place - and I even worked in the rectory. I have a very high opinion of one of my former priests.

I just don't choose to believe that Jesus was God's son, and that he's in heaven now, or that he's coming back one day to judge the living and the dead.

Crucified under Pontius Pilate, suffered, died, and was buried? That part I believe.
 
Posts: 8185 | Registered: Wed September 28 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
PS - I don't think the core messages of the Catholic Church are crap. For the most part. I think they're very worthwhile messages.

I just don't know why you need to believe that Jesus rose from the dead to believe in his message.
 
Posts: 8185 | Registered: Wed September 28 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Skipper of the Lake Erie Booze Patrol
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Picture of Westside Steve
Posted Hide Post
quote:
So now we're going to pretend that he really just meant the Immaculate Conception. Fancy that.



So you won't answer?
OK
Well I guess I've said what I meant.
I don't expect it from you.

I say there are core beliefs that make you Catholic.
You are free to disbelieve any of them.
But I'd say you might consider calling yourself something else.

Not doing that, however, makes you dishonest IMO.
WSS
 
Posts: 5751 | Location: Norton Ohio USA | Registered: Mon September 15 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Hall of Fame Legend
Picture of Legacy Fan
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I just don't know why you need to believe that Jesus rose from the dead to believe in his message.


Because he said he would. Wink
 
Posts: 2819 | Location: Virginia | Registered: Fri August 03 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
quote:
But to answer your question, having been out with friends all day, yes, one can be Catholic and not believe in the Immaculate Conception. The Immaculate Conception is a 19th century creation of the church, not something drawn directly from the Bible.

No one is going to be excommunicated or denied Communion for that either.


Wasn't that your question?

And if you don't believe enough of the Catholic doctrine, yes, you might want to consider calling yourself something else. But that's not what you said. You said either they have to believe in everything, like demonic possession, or they're not Catholics, and also liars.

It was a ridiculous statement used to equate Bobby Jindal's beliefs in the personal power of exorcism with John Kerry's. Because, once again, you can't tell two unlike things apart.

"Hey, they both call themselves Catholic - they must believe exactly the same things."
 
Posts: 8185 | Registered: Wed September 28 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Skipper of the Lake Erie Booze Patrol
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Picture of Westside Steve
Posted Hide Post
quote:
It was a ridiculous statement used to equate Bobby Jindal's beliefs in the personal power of exorcism with John Kerry's. Because, once again, you can't tell two unlike things apart.

"Hey, they both call themselves Catholic - they must believe exactly the same things."



Yeah Heck.
Big difference.
One has an R and one a D after his name.

And if you don't believe in immaculate conception, you just aren't a Catholic.
So I say you're wrong and merely bickering.

WSS
 
Posts: 5751 | Location: Norton Ohio USA | Registered: Mon September 15 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
Again, I'll let the Catholics I know who don't believe in Immaculate Conception, which was the church's 19th century attempt to square the circle of how Mary could have been born without original sin and thus given birth to God's son, that you don't think they're Catholic either.

Even though they live their lives to follow Christ's message, and think the Catholic Church is the closest vessel of Christ's message, and believe in the rituals and sacraments performed in the Catholic Church, which they consider worthwhile and/or divine.

But sure, you can believe whatever you like. They're not really Catholic because they dispute what a Pope said was true in the 1800s.

And by your questioning, I'm guessing you're one of those people who doesn't know what the Immaculate Conception is, or what the doctrine was put in place to do, and confuse it with the virgin birth of Christ.
 
Posts: 8185 | Registered: Wed September 28 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
As fro the R and the D, you're just being a simpleton. It's really, really tiresome. Somehow I can have these principled debates with Tupa without it descending into this kind of crap, but it's really all you can muster.

If there were Democrats who performed some makeshift exorcism when they were in their early 20s, maybe you'd have a point that I was simply ignoring the time John Kerry and his Yale buddies did exactly the same thing. But they didn't. It's apples and oranges. And since you can't admit that some forms of Catholicism differ from others (and what Jindal participated in isn't even sanctioned by the Catholic Church) you resort to this kind of nonsense.

Because, as we see every day and in every way, you can't distinguish between two unlike things.
 
Posts: 8185 | Registered: Wed September 28 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Skipper of the Lake Erie Booze Patrol
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Picture of Westside Steve
Posted Hide Post
quote:
But sure, you can believe whatever you like. They're not really Catholic because they dispute what a Pope said was true in the 1800s.



When did the pope back off immaculate conception???

What's next; dump the cross logo?
WSS
 
Posts: 5751 | Location: Norton Ohio USA | Registered: Mon September 15 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
He didn't.

Do you really think that all Catholics believe that what the Pope or the Church has said is as equally important as what Christ said?

You're really reaching here. Yes, there are some beliefs that make someone a Catholic. But Catholicism does not require full-scale adherence to every single edict and doctrine ever put forward by the Church, as you suggest.

Or back to the original point, one not need believe in demonic possession to be a Catholic. And if you don't believe in demonic possession and still call yourself a Catholic, that doesn't make you a liar.

I can't believe you're still holding on to these ridiculous points.
 
Posts: 8185 | Registered: Wed September 28 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
Dama, I hope you see the flaw in your assumption that Heck must be troubled because he doesn't believe in unprovable and often absurd supernatural tales.

I've met him. He's a really happy, likable, and successful guy. Very funny, nice to the wait staff, and so on.

Frankly, I know as many admitted athiests/agnostics as I do active Catholics and Jews, and the vast majority of the combined whole are actually agnostics. That is, they go or don't go to church as a pragmatic choice, not as part of absolutely knowing anything. And they're quite aware that they don't.

And there's no correlation that I can see between "faith" (choosing to believe) and happiness or kindness. Zilch.
 
Posts: 23993 | Registered: Sat September 13 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Hall of Fame Legend
Posted Hide Post
Shep's comment reminded me of this, so I'll post it:
quote:
• The 2004 General Social Survey (G.S.S.) reveals that 43 percent of people who attended a house of worship weekly (“religious” people, for short) said they were “very happy” with their lives, versus 23 percent of people who attended seldom or never (“secularists”).

• Religious people are a third more likely than secularists to say they are optimistic about the future. Secularists are nearly twice as likely as religious people to say, “I am inclined to feel I am a failure.” Big happiness differences persist between religious and secular folks even when we correct for income, education, race, sex, and age.
 
Posts: 3377 | Registered: Tue March 21 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Numbers Retired and hangs in the rafters
Posted Hide Post
Tom, so you know, there was a 20/20 on the modern Athiest movement, and their stats were virtual opposites.

BTW, the accepted definition of an agnostic athiest is that not only is the nature of God uknowable, but also the existence of God. An "AA" does NOT conclude that there is no God.

That's it. Nothing more. I personally find that impossible to argue with. I don't mind at all if others disagree.

I wouldn't be stunned that people who go to church would report themselves as happier, or that they might find peace in "believing."

There are many "beliefs" that would make me more peaceful and happier... if I could make myself buy off on them. If I could steadily and carefully be delivered a measured amount of opiates, I might report myself as happier, too.
 
Posts: 23993 | Registered: Sat September 13 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  
 

FRONT PAGE    SPORTS BOARD  Hop To Forum Categories  Political Discussion    Jindal performs exorcisms

Designed by: CreAtens